Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Viruses ; 13(7)2021 06 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1335218

ABSTRACT

African swine fever (ASF) has been present in Lithuania since 2014. It is mainly the wild boar population that is affected. Currently, little is known about the epidemiological course of ASF in Lithuania. In the present study, ASF surveillance data from 2016-2021 were analyzed. The numbers of samples taken from hunted wild boar and wild boar found dead per year and month were recorded and the prevalence was estimated for each study month and administrative unit. A Bayesian space-time model was used to calculate the temporal trend of the prevalence estimates. In addition, population data were analyzed on a yearly basis. Most samples were investigated in 2016 and 2017 and originated from hunted animals. Prevalence estimates of ASF virus-positive wild boar decreased from May 2019 onwards. Seroprevalence estimates showed a slight decrease at the same time, but they increased again at the end of the study period. A significant decrease in the population density was observed over time. The results of the study show that ASF is still present in the Lithuanian wild boar population. A joint interdisciplinary effort is needed to identify weaknesses in the control of ASF in Lithuania and to combat the disease more successfully.


Subject(s)
African Swine Fever Virus/immunology , African Swine Fever/epidemiology , African Swine Fever/immunology , Epidemiological Monitoring/veterinary , Sus scrofa/virology , African Swine Fever Virus/pathogenicity , Animals , Bayes Theorem , Lithuania/epidemiology , Population Density , Prevalence , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Swine
2.
Prev Vet Med ; 188: 105281, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1051106

ABSTRACT

Pigs (Sus scrofa) may be important surveillance targets for risk assessment and risk-based control planning against emerging zoonoses. Pigs have high contact rates with humans and other animals, transmit similar pathogens as humans including CoVs, and serve as reservoirs and intermediate hosts for notable human pandemics. Wild and domestic pigs both interface with humans and each other but have unique ecologies that demand different surveillance strategies. Three fundamental questions shape any surveillance program: where, when, and how can surveillance be conducted to optimize the surveillance objective? Using theory of mechanisms of zoonotic spillover and data on risk factors, we propose a framework for determining where surveillance might begin initially to maximize a detection in each host species at their interface. We illustrate the utility of the framework using data from the United States. We then discuss variables to consider in refining when and how to conduct surveillance. Recent advances in accounting for opportunistic sampling designs and in translating serology samples into infection times provide promising directions for extracting spatio-temporal estimates of disease risk from typical surveillance data. Such robust estimates of population-level disease risk allow surveillance plans to be updated in space and time based on new information (adaptive surveillance) thus optimizing allocation of surveillance resources to maximize the quality of risk assessment insight.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases, Emerging/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/veterinary , Public Health Surveillance/methods , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Swine Diseases/virology , Zoonoses/epidemiology , Animals , Animals, Wild/virology , Coronavirus/isolation & purification , Disease Reservoirs/virology , Humans , Sus scrofa/virology , Swine/virology , Zoonoses/transmission
3.
Acta Cir Bras ; 35(8): e202000808, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-788997

ABSTRACT

Infectious viruses pose a threat to all living organisms, including humans, and can cause significant morbidity. Previous experience with pigs in medical education and research, rather than in domestic control settings, has led to a unique perspective on viral infections in swine. In this article, common porcine infectious diseases have been listed, based mainly on the authors' experience thus far. For example, young domestic pigs that were used in surgical training and infected with hepatitis E were subjected to quarantine and isolation treatment, and attempts were made to develop a DNA vaccine for swine influenza arising from swine-to-human transmission. More recent research has focused on preventing infection by the African swine virus, a current threat. We hope that this article of porcine infectious diseases identified at the School of Medicine will help develop a breakthrough with regard to coronavirus disease.


Subject(s)
Disease Models, Animal , Education, Medical , Sus scrofa/virology , Virus Diseases/veterinary , Animals , Humans , Japan , Swine , Virus Diseases/transmission
4.
APMIS ; 128(6): 451-462, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-155071

ABSTRACT

Bacteria and viruses were analysed in the upper respiratory tract of symptomatic pig farmers and their domestic pigs. Eighty six human nasal and 495 (50 pools) porcine snout swabs were collected in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. Staphylococcus (S.) aureus (62.8%, 54/86), human rhino- and coronaviruses (HRV, 29.1%, 25/86; HCoV, 16.3%, 14/86) were frequently detected in humans, while Haemophilus parasuis (90.0%, 45/50), Mycoplasma hyorhinis (78.6%, 11/14), Enterovirus G (EV-G, 56.0%, 28/50) and S. aureus (36.0%, 18/50), respectively, were highly prevalent in pigs. The detection of S. aureus in human follow-up samples indicates a carrier status. The methicillin-resistant phenotype (MRSA) was identified in 33.3% (18/54) of nasal swabs and in one of 18 (5.6%) pooled snout swabs that were tested positive for S. aureus. Strains were indicative of the livestock-associated clonal complex CC398, with t011 being the most common staphylococcal protein A type. Enterobacterales and non-fermenters were frequently isolated from swabs. Their detection in follow-up samples suggests a carrier status. All were classified as being non-multiresistant. There was no example for cross-species transmission of viruses. In contrast, transmission of S. aureus through occupational contact to pigs seems possible. The study contributes to the 'One Health' approach.


Subject(s)
Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Staphylococcal Infections/veterinary , Sus scrofa/microbiology , Sus scrofa/virology , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Animals , Carrier State , Humans , Livestock , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Nasal Mucosa/microbiology , Nasal Mucosa/virology , Occupational Diseases/microbiology , Prevalence , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/transmission , Swine , Swine Diseases/microbiology , Swine Diseases/transmission , Swine Diseases/virology , Virus Diseases/epidemiology , Virus Diseases/transmission , Virus Diseases/veterinary
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL